|This page is a text version of the RM of Rhineland History Book. You can purchase a PDF copy of the book in our online store. The PDF copy is an exact page by page representation of the original book. This text version has been reformated for the web and contains text recognition mistakes. These mistakes do not appear in the purchased version. The purchased version also includes each image in the original book.|
Page Index of the RM of Rhineland History Book
Previous - Page 157 or Next - Page 159
Jacob Schwartz lumberyard in Altona - 1920's. The small white building is the Sommerfelder Waisenamt ottrce.
Credit: D. K. Friesen
the co-operative ideology espoused by institutions like the Rhineland Agricultural Society and leaders such as 1. 1. Siemens. Mennonites did not naturally accept the co-operative principle, but had to be persuaded that it was a solution to their social and economic problems.'
The new socio-economic institutions which began emerging in Rhineland in the 1930's were neither religious nor individualistic, but based on a secular ethic of co-operation in business and community life. This co-operative action not only began to redefine the relationships between farmers in the municipality, but also the relationship between the towns and the countryside. When farmers and town residents began to perceive their interests as interdependent and as they began to participate in co-operative ventures, the Mennonite dichotomy of vil lage and farm versus the town began to break down.
Drought and Depression
All parts of Canada experienced hard times during the 1930's, but particularly hard hit were the prairies. The prairie economy, based as it was on agriculture, was especially vulnerable to the vagaries of weather and export markets. With the collapse of the stock market in 1929, foreign markets for Canadian foodstuffs collapsed, and prices for all agricultural products dropped rapidly. Wheat that had sold for $1.06 a bushel in 1929 sold for only 38 cents in 1932.2 Farmers in Rhineland,